There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

absquatulate ,

Yeah, privacy. That’s definitely what it’s for

stepan ,

I kinda regret being defederated from Lemmy tankies, I’m curious how are they going to defend this.

sunzu ,

Shepooh is a real leader in like biden

Railcar8095 ,

*something something google exist so it’s basically the same something west propaganda something fuck Ukraine

There, I saved you from having to interact with that scum

PythagreousTitties ,

Capitalism bad!

…oh wait

Raptor_007 ,

“Could?” No. “Absolutely would.”

Dark_Dragon ,

Yea we will protect your privacy. Give us your social security and unique identifier. We won’t target you specifically /s

ivanafterall ,
@ivanafterall@lemmy.world avatar

I’m going to need you all to send me your bank account details so that I can protect your finances.

1984 ,
@1984@lemmy.today avatar

Yes more “protection”.

nondescripthandle ,

So this is different from Korean iPIN because Chinese people can only get it from the government in the new proposal? It looks like they both already tie online presence to traceable identifiers, just Korea allows you to get it from government or private company and China wants to take that ability away from private companies.

aleq ,
@aleq@lemmy.world avatar

They already have something kinda like this. All public wifis require that you sign in with phone number and SMS-verification. It might not be as air-tight as whatever the article is about (like a chad I only read headlines), but in practice it seems pretty darn tight IMO.

nondescripthandle ,

I read the article because I was quite sure China already had internet identifiers. This article is just about China wanting to make the government the sole proprieter of internet identities. Propaganda line or not that does make the privacy line make sense as less organizations are tracking your identifiers, and it’s not as if the CPC wouldn’t have the access to information the non government companies have. My sense is you’re not really hiding from them simply by using private companies whenever you can. It’s a tighter grip for sure, but it’s not going to change much on its own.

sunzu ,

Now do America NYT

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •