There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

ramenshaman ,

Gotta say I’m not impressed. I downloaded a picture of Sofia Vergara and it gave her really small boobs.

Spacehooks ,

“Hey you can get Women’s face deep faked into porn”

But why would I pay money to see her railed by other dudes?

fne8w2ah ,

That’s the 21st century equivalent to those ceral box x-ray glasses!

A_Random_Idiot , (edited )

What kind of mentally unhinged active threat to society would even think of creating such a thing, much less use such a thing?

edit Boy I wish I knew who the downvoters were, i bet the FBI would love to have a gander at their computers.

Quexotic ,

Just created a Dall-e image of a woman. AI undresser instantly undressed it.

Kinda chilling.

damnfinecoffee ,

Reminds me of Arthur C Clarke’s The Light of Other Days. There’s a technology in the book that allows anyone to see anything, anywhere, which eliminates all privacy. Society collectively adjusts, e.g. people masturbate on park benches because who gives a shit, people can tune in to watch me shower anyway.

Although not to the same extreme, I wonder if this could similarly desensitize people: even if it’s fake, if you can effectively see anyone naked… what does that do to our collective beliefs and feelings about nakedness?

flamehenry ,

It could also lead to a human version of “Paris Syndrome” where people AI Undress their crush, only to be sorely disappointed when the real thing is not as good.

justastranger ,

I’m predicting clothing lines designed to trick the AIs into thinking you’re better endowed than you really are

PandaPikachu ,

It would be interesting to know how many people are using it for themselves. I’d think it would open up next level catfishing. Here’s an actual pic of me, and here’s a pic of what I might look like naked. I’m sure some people with photoshop skills we’re already doing that to a certain extent, but now it’s accessible to everyone.

randon31415 ,

Back in the day, cereal boxes contain “xray glasses”. I feel like if those actually worked as intended, we would have already had this issue figured out.

cleverusernametry ,

There are so many though!! Which ones? Like which ones specifically??

thorbot ,

Yeah, I need to know so I can stop my kids from using them. Specifically which ones?

badbytes ,

Asking for a friend

valkyre09 ,

And people will agree to have their photographs taken, because of the implication …

vox ,
@vox@sopuli.xyz avatar

deepnude has been a thing for like 6 years?

snek ,
@snek@lemmy.world avatar

They can go ahead, but they’ll never get that mole in the right place.

CascadianGiraffe ,

Can I pick where they put my extra finger?

DrMango ,

I think we already know where that little guy belongs

ThatFembyWho ,

Great! Now whenever someone finds all my secret nudes, I’ll just claim they’re deepfakes

curiousaur ,

Honestly, were probably just going to have to get over it. Or pull the plug on the whole ai thing, but good luck with that.

grandkaiser ,

Can’t put the genie back in the bottle

uriel238 ,
@uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Though the picture suggests we should also create really a robot or really a cyborg edits of celebrities.

As an afterthought, really a reptilian images for our political figures would also be in good order.

Intheflsun ,
@Intheflsun@lemmy.world avatar

Jesus, as if Facebook “researchers” weren’t already linking to Onion articles, now you’ll give them pictures.

uriel238 , (edited )
@uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

It tells me we’re less interested in the data (the skin map and topography) than we are in seeing the data in raw form, whether it is accurate or not. It tells me a primary pretense of body doubles was ineffective since society responds the same way regardless of whether an actress’ nudity is real or simulated.

Not sure how this will be enforceable any more than we can stop malicious actors from printing guns. Personally, I would prefer a clothes-optional society were individuals aren’t measured by the media exposure of their bodies or history of lovers. Maybe in another age or two.

In fiction, I imagined the capacity to render porn action into mo-cap data, to capture fine-resoluton triangle maps and skin texture maps from media, ultimately to render any coupling one could desire with a robust physics engine and photography effects to render it realistic (or artistic, however one prefers). It saddens me that one could render an actress into an Elsa Jean scenario and by doing so, wreck their career.

Porn doesn’t bother me, but the arbitrariness with which we condemn individuals by artificial scandal disgusts me more than the raunchiest debauchery.

flamehenry ,

Data. Return to your quarters

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •