Analog , 4 months ago

Are you sure you interpreted that statement correctly?

Article said:

The overwhelming force that SWAT teams employ is designed to ensure officer safety, which Schock acknowledges is important. But he says this needs to be balanced by people’s rights against unreasonable searches and seizures. “We’re not in Afghanistan or Gaza,” he says.

If Afghanistan or Gaza have something similar to the fourth amendment, then maybe I can see your take.

Otherwise, and what the author seems to be inferring, is that those countries don’t have protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. Not that their people are in any way less human.