What the fuck, how did you interpret me saying “not needing AI” as me meaning “because there is infinite real detail”? All I was saying is that AI would be unnecessary to recover the detail available in film with currently existing technology, there are no contradictions in that.
If you misunderstand someone and they correct you, thats not “mansplaining”.
To then act like your interpretation is still absolutely correct, is disingenuous at best, and one-up-manship at worst.