There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

eager_eagle ,
@eager_eagle@lemmy.world avatar

Naturally, Gaetz brings porn into this.

lmao

Zorsith ,
@Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Man, i feel like getting your content brought before congress is almost as much of an achievement as getting a weird al parody

sundray ,

There I Ruined It only uses AI to change his voice so it sounds like the artist he’s parodying (and a small amount of auto-tune) – 99% of the vocal performance real human singing.

FireTower ,
@FireTower@lemmy.world avatar

The video’s maker claims this is parody but seems more like just satire with receives less legal protections typically. It doesn’t seem that there’s any commentary on the work original IPs, given the rest of his body of work.

rc__buggy ,

It’s straight up parody. It’s a composition in the style of Johnny Cash that’s meant to be funny. That’s parody.

FireTower ,
@FireTower@lemmy.world avatar

It’s a composition in the style of Johnny Cash that’s meant to be funny. That’s parody.

That’s satire. In the US for something to be parody it has to be a commentary on the original work(s) or author(s). A parody of Johnny Cash would be something like if they used AI to copy his song note for note but had lyrics that criticized him for portraying himself as bluecollar in his music despite his wealth.

Parody receives higher protection than satire because the parodist is actually trying to make a statement. Most “music parody” like that of Weird Al is satire, which is why Weird Al asks for permission from the original artists.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •