300 tweets is nothing, so essentially new users are limited to very casual reading.
Don't forget, that just clicking/tapping on a tweet opens the discussions about that tweet which in turn are each separate tweets. So opening a single, controversial tweet you actually want to read, might easily result in 20 read tweets as far as the API is concerned.
Let’s put limits on how many things you can view at the same time as putting a sign up gate to see anything. How do you think your platform got any users to begin with? It’s almost like he has no idea how anything he’s making decisions on actually works but that would be an unfair assumption? /s
How fast can one really read 6000 post ? Assuming you read 100 post a minute, is that 1 hour of usage before getting cut off for the day? I dont really have a feeling how many posts a normal twitter user would go through in a minute.
Before Elon Musk's takeover of the social media platform last year, Twitter signed a multi-year contract with Google related to fighting spam and protecting accounts, among other things, the report said.
Sounds like it's not about hosting their infrastructure but tangential services.
Of course Elon Musk thinks he can anti-spam and protect accounts better by himself and without external cost.
I'd love to see cloud hosters refusing to work with Elon Musk because of all the unpaid bills stuff.
mildlyinfuriating
Top
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.