There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

SweetCitrusBuzz ,
@SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org avatar

Very few, if any tech companies care about consent.

gregor OP ,

As Louis Rossman says, they have a rapist mentality.

quinkin ,

Would you like to review our app?: Yes or Not Now.

gregor OP ,

If an open source app asks me to do so, I usually give it a five star review. It’s the least I can do to support them and make them visible on Google Play.

ohellidk ,

Unlock origin + Firefox! The harassment stops. I’d rather donate to the unlock team monthly instead of paying google for a solution to a problem they created.

velox_vulnus ,

You also need to add SponsorBlock to skip in-video advertisements.

ton618 ,
@ton618@lemm.ee avatar

I don’t know, most creators I watch put a creative spin on those, and it’s fun to watch. ¯⁠\⁠⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠⁠/⁠¯

TheTechnician27 ,
@TheTechnician27@lemmy.world avatar

FYI, SponsorBlock isn’t just for skipping sponsored segments. SB gives you granular control over the sorts of sections you can skip, and it only auto-skips sponsors by default. However:

  • There are several categories of section, including intro animation/intermission (“an interval without actual content”), preview (i.e. where the information already exists later in the video), sponsor (a segment made in return for payment from a third party), unpaid/self-promotion (e.g. “buy my merch”), interaction reminder (e.g. “remember to like and subscribe”), and endcards/credits. (There’s also “filler tangent/jokes”, but I haven’t tried this one.)
  • For each of these categories, you can choose to disable altogether, show in the seek bar, prompt to manually skip, or auto skip.

So even if you would never want to skip a sponsored segment in your life, the extension still saves a ton of time if you have no/limited interest in watching even just one of the above-listed categories.

ton618 ,
@ton618@lemm.ee avatar

I see, thanks for a thorough explanation! Didn’t know it was this advanced.

TheTechnician27 ,
@TheTechnician27@lemmy.world avatar

Absolutely! And what I ran down is just the extent of the features I personally interact with; there are a fair few more, including one that aims to combat clickbait by changing clickbaity titles.

lolrightythen ,

I got me some new devices recently. Researching and adding privacy/security add ons to Firefox was surprisingly enjoyable.

The idea that I have some measure of control over what I experience - and what I give in return - is novel to me.

The -10 or so extensions work well enough. It’s still the internet, but it’s an earlier version. Better than what currently exists.

Jyek ,

Actually YouTube kinda built in the feature lol. It detects sections of the video most people skip and gives you a button to skip it as well. All right inside the YouTube app.

SnotFlickerman , (edited )
@SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Pi-Hole + VPN and you can stop mobile ads as well. (You connect your phone to your VPN, whose traffic passes through your Pi-Hole)

Ublock Origin also works on Firefox mobile for Android, but that only works inside the browser.

You need the Pi-Hole network-level blocking to block ads in apps.

dulce_3t_decorum_3st ,
@dulce_3t_decorum_3st@lemmy.world avatar

$5 a month and you can share with 5 other users. That’s 90c per person. Why would anyone not have YouTube premium?

davel ,
@davel@lemmy.ml avatar

Because I’m not giving Alphabet any information about me. It’s also why I don’t create a YouTube account and use browsers with common fingerprints.

SnotFlickerman , (edited )
@SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Trying to avoid fingerprinting often results in easier fingerprinting.

Your browser might have a common fingerprint, but other points of configuration (screen size, window size, webrtc, etc) belie those.

Usually it just gets you put in the “People who don’t like ads” advertising bin. They have specific ways to try to target us.

Relevant Bill Hicks: www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXi-9kA4ERM&t=75s

I know what all the marketing people are thinking right now, too.

“Oh you know what Bill’s doing? He’s going for that ‘anti-marketing dollar.’ That’s a good market, he’s very smart.”

davel ,
@davel@lemmy.ml avatar

ther points of configuration (screen size, window size, webrtc, etc) belie those.

Those are also part of the fingerprinting that I’m talking about, and browsers like Tor and Mullvad take some or all of them into account.

gamermanh ,
@gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Because I can get the same results + more for free

fuckwit_mcbumcrumble ,

Where are you at where it’s $5 a month for the family plan? In the US it’s $15 for the single user, or $23 for the family plan.

dulce_3t_decorum_3st ,
@dulce_3t_decorum_3st@lemmy.world avatar

South Africa

abfarid ,
@abfarid@startrek.website avatar

I pay ₴150 (Ukrainian hryvnia) for a family plan of 6, which is currently roughly $3.60 (after the currency tanked due to war). hide the pain dab

Matriks404 ,

That’s interesting, here in Poland you pay ~$12 for the family plan.

I didn’t know it was that expensive in US. That sucks, man.

metaStatic ,

first and foremost you're paying for a worse experience than just installing an adblocker.

Paying for convenience isn't the same as paying to not be inconvenienced.

halcyoncmdr ,
@halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world avatar

I pay for Premium for a few different reasons:

  1. I don’t need to even think about fighting with ad block blockers.
  2. I also get YouTube Music, so I no longer need to pay for Spotify.
  3. Premium views pay creators more than regular views.
henfredemars ,

For me it’s a way to help support content creators, along with donations/merch, although admittedly not having to even try to block the ads is a nice bonus.

I wouldn’t necessarily call myself a YouTube fan, and it will be something I continue to evaluate.

metaStatic ,

There is clearly a value proposition or no one would pay for it.
I personally don't like to reward any company using the pay to not be inconvenienced model

A lot of people would rather fight adblockers (idk, literally never been an issue for me),
use xManager (oh right spotify is free) ,
Pay creators you like through patreon (or buy their shitty amazon links or merch or whatever)

Premium is just rewarding youtube for making their platform worse in order to sell premium and fuck that noise.

fuckwit_mcbumcrumble ,

Youtube premium gives you a higher bitrate option as well.

I think it’s only for lower resolutions (other than 4k) but if the video was uploaded with an absurdly high bitrate you can see a slightly less destroyed version.

zante ,

Because it’s £15 in the uk ?

TheGrandNagus ,

They speak of sharing with others, so they’re talking about the family plan, so it’s actually £20 in the UK.

The_Cunt_of_Monte_Cristo ,
@The_Cunt_of_Monte_Cristo@lemmy.world avatar

It is not about money. Google created a problem and then asked money to solve it. If I were a billionaire I still wouldn’t paid a single penny.

don ,

Because it’s $15 in the us? lol

TheGrandNagus ,

It’s £20 ($26.33) per month here. You are either lying or are in an exceptionally cheap country.

Matriks404 ,

I can think only for one legitimate reason:

  • Google bought out YouTube and operated it at loss for most of its life, effectively making it a monopoly in the process, and only started to earn money on it when there was no way any other alternative would come up and endanger it.

If you ignore this, YouTube Premium is a pretty good offer. And I personally like the fact that I support content creators, without the need of watching ads that are nothing more than cancer for society.

That said, I would still prefer YouTube to return to its roots and separate from Google, since it’s pretty much possible for it to stand on its own right now, I guess.

JusticeForPorygon ,
@JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world avatar
lolcatnip ,

The way you say no is by not visiting the site.

lugal ,

No means no but ask me later means ask me later. You never said no. Source: the option doesn’t exist

Someonelol ,
@Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

You don’t get to say “No” to YouTube, Microsoft, or the thousands of websites that ask to you to give them your email. There’s only a “Maybe later”.

traches ,

I fuuuhuhuhucking hate this condescending, pestering dark pattern that apparently every single designer on the planet is required to use

helpImTrappedOnline ,

Yes they are. But no one who can do anything about it is doing anything about it.

SnotFlickerman , (edited )
@SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Uhm, that’ s just capitalism in a nutshell.

Everything is just routing around people telling you “no.”

Government regulation is literally the epitome of being told “no” and they spend all the money in the fucking world to force it into a “yes.”

I mean, these people are so far up their own asses, I’ve seen ad industry people say seriously that people avoiding ads is breaking a contract. The genuine attitude that if they paid for the ad, in real life or online, that we owe them our eyes on it because they spent money on it. They’re so far out of touch that they can’t even face small risk.

Is it really a shock that a lot of people in corporate America are actual fucking rapists?

Gates, Weinstein, Musk, Trump, McMahon, I could go on… Plenty of these guys are well documented as not being able to take “no” for an answer, even if there’s no evidence they raped anyone (Gates, for example).

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines