There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

memes

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

mbgid , in Who ever thought it sounded good this way? I think it's because headphones weren't widely used back then.

You know, I love those albums where they fucked around did things like hard-pan all the drums to the right channel. I’m here for the experimentation.

astrsk , in Who ever thought it sounded good this way? I think it's because headphones weren't widely used back then.
@astrsk@fedia.io avatar

It’s fun and interesting all the experimentation that went on back then. As someone deaf in one ear… it’s hard to truly appreciate, but I get it.

banazir , in Who ever thought it sounded good this way? I think it's because headphones weren't widely used back then.
@banazir@lemmy.ml avatar

I’d be perfectly fine if everything was just mixed mono. I see little value in stereo. I’m weird like that.

zaphod ,

In electronic music you often slightly detune the left and right of a synthesizer to make it sound “wide”, you can’t do that in mono and if you mix the stereo down to mono it sounds boring.

can ,

However most clubs are going to be playing mono so always bounce to mono and test mix.

strawberry ,

like @zaphod said, its mostly to make it sound wider. in mono, everything sounds like its in the center of your skull. in stereo, some stuff it a few inches from my ear (wherever the drivers are), some stuff can be in my head, some can even be in my throat if that makes sense

minticecream , in Who ever thought it sounded good this way? I think it's because headphones weren't widely used back then.

Turns out early audio consoles with stereo didn’t have a pan knob. They had a pan switch. So choices were limited to left, right, or center (mono).

Wasn’t til later that the pan pot was invented allowing incremental panning and true stereo mixing.

Hammocks4All OP ,

That’s wild. But theoretically they could make two separate mono tracks, right? For example, a left mono track with 75% of what would have been an isolated left channel + 25% of the right channel and, similarly, a right mono track with 25% of what would have been an isolated left + 75% of the right. Then, sure, pan switch it fully to left and right.

SpaceNoodle ,

That’s even more complicated.

bizarroland ,

Exactly. Plus the common use of mastering at the time was to optimize the recorded audio for printing on a vinyl disc, and if the grooves were too deep or the transitions to Sharp it could cause the needle to skip out of the track.

If your average listener is going to be listening on a mono device then a smart thing to do would be to pan one thing consistently to one side and the other to the other as the mono needle isn't going to care where it's getting its vibrations from. That would give you more resolution and more depth for the cut, as long as the final disc was only played in mono.

I'm not saying that's the case for every recording but I'm pretty sure it has happened quite a few times back then while they were still figuring everything out.

Num10ck , in Who ever thought it sounded good this way? I think it's because headphones weren't widely used back then.

has anyone tried out apple’s ‘spatial audio’ and how it compares to 5.1?

unreachable , in Who ever thought it sounded good this way? I think it's because headphones weren't widely used back then.
@unreachable@lemmy.world avatar

karaoke moment

someguy3 , in Who ever thought it sounded good this way? I think it's because headphones weren't widely used back then.

This might explain why old players had a mono/stereo setting.

MermaidsGarden , in Who ever thought it sounded good this way? I think it's because headphones weren't widely used back then.
@MermaidsGarden@lemmy.world avatar

This would be more early 60’s, mostly because those engineers were working with 2 track stereo which really limits your options. Most artists were recording on at least 8 track stereo by the 70’s.

sfbing ,

Exactly. This is a 60s thing, not a 70s thing.

the_post_of_tom_joad , in Who ever thought it sounded good this way? I think it's because headphones weren't widely used back then.
@the_post_of_tom_joad@hexbear.net avatar

One of the worst abuses of stereo in my opinion are old Beatles albums. Maybe cuz the tech was somewhat new they were playing far too much? Too much for me anyway

Orbituary , in Who ever thought it sounded good this way? I think it's because headphones weren't widely used back then.
@Orbituary@lemmy.world avatar

There’s actually a biological reason for this, believe it or not. Language and music “time share” many characteristics of both hemispheres of the brain. Language and music are processed in different hemispheres.

Read pages 20-26 of the book “How Music Really Works” by Wayne Chase. It breaks it down in detail.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines