There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

Th4tGuyII ,
@Th4tGuyII@fedia.io avatar

It really saddens to me see how many managers out there treat their subordinates terribly, and then act surprised when their subordinates do the same - as though employees are meant to greatful for their terrible treatment

ech ,

files.catbox.moe/odekq1.jpg

brbposting ,

Does ring true dunnit?

Sometimes people use “respect” to mean “treating someone like a person” and sometimes they use “respect” to mean “treating someone like an authority”

and sometimes people who are used to being treated like an authority say “if you won’t respect me I won’t respect you” and they mean “if you won’t treat me like an authority I won’t treat you like a person”

and they think they’re being fair but they aren’t, and it’s not okay.

ZeroTemp ,

I recently was recently reprimanded for using the term “subordinates”. I was informed that term has fallen out of favor. Direct Reports is the proper way to say it these days.

Nouveau_Burnswick ,

What about indirect reports?

toddestan ,

That’s who you are to all the people who aren’t your boss but think they can tell you what to do anyway.

Nouveau_Burnswick ,

Or just your direct reports’ direct reports.

explodicle ,

Sounds good to me, I’ve never gotten in trouble for indirectreportination.

Excrubulent ,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

Honestly calling someone a “direct report” sounds even more dehumanising. At least calling someone a “subordinate” acknowledges that you’re belittling their existence. A “direct report” sounds like a piece of paper.

Th4tGuyII ,
@Th4tGuyII@fedia.io avatar

Fair enough. Subordinate is the term I've always heard used. Direct reports just sounds like the sugar coated version to me.

ZeroTemp ,

Oh yeah it’s totally the sugar coated version. It’s funny because I was only using the term “subordinates” because that is what the software platform I was training on calls “direct reports”.

br0da ,
@br0da@lemmy.world avatar

This is such an odd restriction for IT staff. Normally HR gives you a form to sign agreeing to working remotely sometimes and having company data on your phone because you know, servers are meant to stay on all the time? It must be nice living in a world where nothing bad happens after hours.

GamingChairModel ,

On the other extreme, 24/7 operations have redundancy.

A friend of mine explained that being an Emergency Medicine physician is a great job for work life balance, despite the fact that he often has to work ridiculous shifts, because he never has to take any work home with him. An Emergency Room is a 24/7 operation, so whenever he’s at home, some other doctor is responsible for whatever happens. So he gets to relax and never think about work when he’s not at work and not on call.

lauha ,

In a sane world, they give you a company phone when you are on reserve duty and they agree to pay compensation for being on reserve. Why would you agree to work for free?

rikudou ,

It’s sad that this is considered malicious at all. Seriously, either working from home is a risk for your company or it isn’t, there’s nothing in between.

sunzu ,

Well u see your employer reserves the right to always be right!

That's the benefit of being "leadership"

BossDj ,

What I need right now supercedes anything I’ve ever said or anything on paper

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • [email protected]
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •