There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

Best GUI VM software

I’d like some recommendations as a beginner in the virtualization space for good GUI software for running vms for both experimentation and server use.

I’ve used virtualbox on Windows before but are there any better alternatives on Linux? I hear a lot of praise of QEMU but this seems to be only terminal based like what you do with containers.

VMware workstation is free but again, I’d like to know your thoughts on other good beginner options.

Thank you advance and have a good day/afternoon/night

Andromxda ,
@Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Virtual Machine Manager is a great GUI frontend for KVM/libvirt and QEMU, and basically the gold standard for VM management on Linux

wildbus8979 ,

Cool thing is it also supports management through ssh, so you can use it as a server orchestrator if your needs don’t require something more involved like proxmox

krolden ,
@krolden@lemmy.ml avatar

virt-manager.org

boredsquirrel ,
@boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net avatar

Virt-manager

ashley ,

For desktop: virt-manager, server: cockpit with the vm plugin.

possiblylinux127 ,

Also Proxmox

boredsquirrel ,
@boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net avatar

Gotta try cockpit with the VM! It pulls in a tooon of dependencies, but may be worth it.

HouseWolf ,

Gnome Boxes has worked pretty well for me.

possiblylinux127 ,

It hides to many options. I just want to create a VM with only 4 cores

HouseWolf ,

You can change the core count AFTER making the VM which I agree is really annoying.

Besides that everything else has worked more reliably than others options I’ve tried.

0x0 ,

You can use VirtualBox on linux as well, not bad for beginners.

possiblylinux127 ,

I wouldn’t go that route in 2024

LeFantome ,

I have been using VirtualBox modified to use KVM as its backend. It has been great on my 2013 MacBook Air.

krolden ,
@krolden@lemmy.ml avatar

Why

als ,

I’ve not used it much but I’m pretty sure GNOME Boxes can be used as a UI for QEMU, KVM, and libvirt .

NeoNachtwaechter ,

I am a huge fan of proxmox, since I first tried it out.

It does a little bit more than just VM’s.

On my home server, I have the proxmox distro running as the only service on bare metal, and then all other work is done in the VM’s.

possiblylinux127 ,

That’s KVM and libvirt which works on any Linux box

kneebiter ,

Proxmox, the free version does everything you want, VM’s and containers.

LeFantome ,

Not really a desktop option like VirtualBox though.

krolden ,
@krolden@lemmy.ml avatar

Its Debian so you can just install any desktop you want

Also virtual box is pointless garbage especially if you’re using Linux

LeFantome ,

If you use GNOME, try Boxes.

avidamoeba ,
@avidamoeba@lemmy.ca avatar

VMware Player is the best by far in terms of GUI and ease of use. With that said:

  • It breaks once in a while due to kernel module / kernel mismatches that sometimes require manual patching. This is rare but it happens once every couple of years
  • It may become paid given Broadcom’s corporate history

Virt-manager is pretty decent and it will not break on a stable distro but:

  • Some of it workflows are far from intuitive
  • Virtualization via virt-manager (really KVM) doesn’t currently have any 3D acceleration for Windows VMs
  • Windows driver/guest tools installation and integration isn’t nearly as trivial as it is with VMware

Personally, I’d try using virt-manager because it will work “forever.” If you can’t get something to work and feel overwhelmed, go to VMware for now but long term you’ll likely have to get used to virt-manager.

possiblylinux127 ,

I would avoid VMware with a ten foot pole. Also I personally think virtual manager is easier to use.

avidamoeba , (edited )
@avidamoeba@lemmy.ca avatar

It objectively takes fewer mouse clicks and keyboard keystrokes to install a Windows VM with drivers and full integration (3D, shared folders, etc.) on VMware Player than virt-manager. I could count them for you but I have better things to do. Setting up an equivalent VM with virt-manager is significantly more work. Just a trivial example - getting the VirtIO drivers. On virt-manager you have to search the web, find multiple sources, figure out which to use, figure out which version to download, download it. On VMware, you click the top menu, then Install VM tools, the end. With that said I’m not complaining, because I don’t have the time to write the patches needed for virt-manager to work the same, but the difference is there.

possiblylinux127 ,

There is only one source of the drivers and it is the Fedora Project.

docs.fedoraproject.org/…/creating-windows-virtual…

avidamoeba ,
@avidamoeba@lemmy.ca avatar

Are you sure? Cause KVM’s doc lists two: www.linux-kvm.org/page/…/Download_Drivers and the first one ain’t Fedora. The language used doesn’t suggest that one is a canonical source either. Now imagine that I’m a noob or otherwise using KVM for the first time. I have to figure out what the difference is and which one to get because I don’t want to make a mistake and end up with a broken install. Mind you I have ended up with bad graphics depending on which driver and what version I’ve installed.

krolden ,
@krolden@lemmy.ml avatar

Stop suggesting people use vmware

possiblylinux127 ,

Virtual manager and maybe gnome boxes. I don’t like gnome boxes as it hides a lot of settings but has poor defaults.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •