This make absolutely 0 sense. US and Israel have long history of manufacturing terror to justify war campaigns. Hezbollah have no reason to attack “play ground” of people who “do not recognize israel”.
This article reads more or like a piece of propaganda.
If you're going to post a MBFC promoting the factuality of a paper, you should also include other relevant information to allow people to make a fully-formed opinion. And if this article had been about, I dunno, salmon season in Alaska, I wouldn't have brought it up. But the fact that Jewish Press is intensely pro-Israel and rabidly anti-Palestinian is very relevant to any content about the war.
In a worldview it is entirely not uncommon. I think you find this quite often in enclave/enclosed communities where the native language is not that of the general populace. Also in more closed religious communities. I’ve seen this first hand in Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, and even Protestant communities.
So, Bali then. Then you’d know this one - maybe you’re a stupid influencer, and if you take a photograph in a bikini up against the wrong tree – a religious symbol which is unmarked, but yet supposed to be duly noted as being off-limits - you can kiss your visa status goodbye, fined and deported. There are unwritten local and religious rules, managed through local groups which coordinate with the local government. That’s what this is as well.
Please note, I’m not criticizing this. When you are in another country as a guest, you should not just think you can transpose your culture over the native culture and not suffer repercussions.
Troubling times, these. Typically, when a Muslim attacks others in London, the target is usually Christians; and when a Muslim attacks a Jewish group, it's in the Middle East. It's rare to see a Muslim attacking Jews in London.
The Jewish Press publishes both original stories and republished articles from other sources. News is focused on the USA and Israel with an emphasis on the Jewish Community. Articles and headlines are often straightforward and not overly biased, such as this Iran Reports Sunday Morning Accident at Natanz Nuclear Site. Stories are sourced properly.
Editorial content is found under the blog section. The Jewish Press leans right with articles such as this 60 Minutes Deceptively Edits Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis To Push Blatant Smear Job, and this Emes Ve-Emunah: Will Identity Politics Destroy Us? A review of op-eds reveals moderate right-leaning bias; however, news reporting is factual.
Overall, we rate the Jewish Press Right-Center Biased based on editorial positions that moderately favor the right. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact checks record. (D. Van Zandt 3/1/2017) Updated (12/13/2023)
You said this source is “Far better than AlJazeera that gets posted here.”
I just showed you that Al Jazeera has won one of the world’s top journalism awards four times. What are the accolades jewishpress.com have gotten? Because this post was literally the first time I had ever heard of them. You clearly know about them, so please do tell me about their journalistic bona fides.
It’s odd that you care so much about Al Jazeera’s ownership and biases but have said nothing about jewishpress.com’s ownership and biases. Are they bias-free and owned by an unimpeachable company? Do tell me since you must know.
No, they definitely aren’t ideal but they still have better rating and less bias than AlJazeera.
The fact you win journalism awards does not equal not being biased. Take this example: A person/organisation can win contests despite being biased and spreading misinformation. The fact I spread anti-vax propaganda (I don’t, take it as an example), does not disqualify me from winning a biology competition.
they still have better rating and less bias than AlJazeera.
From whom? Let’s see these ratings and compare them.
A person/organisation can win contests despite being biased and spreading misinformation. The fact I spread anti-vax propaganda (I don’t, take it as an example), does not disqualify me from winning a biology competition.
Once again, you seem totally uninterested in jewishpress.com’s possible bias. Why is that?
You didn’t say anything about inaccuracies. You said bias:
That still does not change the fact they are biased, very much against Israel and owned by Qatar where free speech is not a thing.
Also, Media Bias Fact Check does not say Jewish Press is “much less” than Al Jazeera when it comes to bias. In fact, their bias levels are about equal.
I, of course, thought you would check. The fact that their left/right bias is about equal is true. Issue is how AlJazeera reports a lot of bs (such as not recognizing Hamas as a terrorist organization) in terms of this conflict.
Hence it is extremely biased against Israel and you can easily check it by continuing in the article. That’s why I consider it completely irrelevant or at least less relevant than jewishpress.
The source you told me to look at says they have the same amount of bias. This seems to be a “what are you going to believe, me or your own eyes?” situation.
You made multiple statements saying it was more biased as if it were a fact. You also said that site would prove that it is more biased.
Now you are admitting it doesn’t prove it. I gave you plenty of chances and you kept moving the goalposts and pretending you didn’t say something when I even copied and pasted you saying it.
So you’ve been dishonest this entire time.
I don’t think we need to continue this conversation. I’m not interested in talking to people who construct elaborate but obvious lies.
We don’t have to keep continuing this discussion. I have proven several times that aljazeera is being more biased and less trustworthy source than jewishpress. It’s very evident from checking sites like mediabiasfactcheck that aljazeera has a lot of bias. Such comments are not present at the report for jewishpress.
To me it seems like you just refuse to believe that something jewish can be trusted more than aljazeera despite being provided with thorough evidence.
jewishpress.com
Newest