They mention two papers and a press release, but don’t provide links or titles. Also:
For example, the first mammals evolved out of the reptilian order Therapsida.
Therapsids weren’t reptiles, nor did they evolve from reptiles—they were a separate clade that evolved from amphibians alongside reptiles. Some early subclades resembled reptiles, but they were a separate lineage.
If it is income based taxing: they leave, and the demand is filled by someone else who takes their place.
Easy example: grocery store owner A says I don’t like it, moves. Obviously someone else will open a grocery store there if it is needed. They will be taxed accordingly.
If their assets are onshore, they’d either have to sell them or be taxed anyway. If their assets are offshore, they probably weren’t paying taxes on them anyway.
How are we going to fertilize our gardens if we don’t keep our shit in a bucket next to the toilet?
The value these pieces of shit bring to the table is far less than the damages caused by the exploitative business practices that made them rich. Taxes are not a sufficient justification for keeping them around.
So 53% say they’re less likely to leave after the election? That seems to indicate that the candidates elected were marginally more pro millionaire than the previous ones.
That isn’t included the percentage that didn’t change, because they aren’t interested in picking up and leaving the country just because they don’t like the government.
freedomproject.pages.dev
Newest