There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

engadget.com

iAmTheTot , to technology in Meta is promoting Threads posts on Facebook and there’s no way to opt out
@iAmTheTot@kbin.social avatar

Have you heard, Amazon advertises and pushes Audible on their platform!

macallik OP ,

I think the equivalent is actually Amazon's main website sharing to friends your Audible purchases in the hopes it can get you to join Audible

mojo , to technology in Meta is promoting Threads posts on Facebook and there’s no way to opt out

Well I guess that’s one way for ActivityPub integration, just with themselves. Don’t see why that’s a bad idea though, but I also don’t use Facebook.

LainOfTheWired , to technology in Meta is promoting Threads posts on Facebook and there’s no way to opt out
@LainOfTheWired@lemy.lol avatar

No way to opt out. How about leave

guyrocket ,
@guyrocket@kbin.social avatar

Just fucking leave! Do it! Delete FB and hit the gym!

Gregorech ,

Hit the lawyer, deleted gym, Facebook up…

downpunxx , to technology in Meta is promoting Threads posts on Facebook and there’s no way to opt out
@downpunxx@kbin.social avatar

Imagine still using fucking Facebook in the year of the Christians lord 2023

helenslunch ,
@helenslunch@feddit.nl avatar

You and literally half the planet.

schwim , to technology in Meta is promoting Threads posts on Facebook and there’s no way to opt out
@schwim@reddthat.com avatar

There is a way to opt out. Stop using FB.

DingoBilly , to technology in Meta is promoting Threads posts on Facebook and there’s no way to opt out

What’s wrong with that…? Is anyone surprised?

BarrierWithAshes ,
@BarrierWithAshes@kbin.social avatar

Yeah if anything they arent aggressive enough. They should force all IG users to gave threads or even replace all IG comments with threads 'threads'.

loopednetwork , to technology in Meta is promoting Threads posts on Facebook and there’s no way to opt out
@loopednetwork@lemmy.sdf.org avatar

I feel like if you’re still willing to use anything Meta has touched, you have no excuse to be surprised by this kind of thing.

atzanteol , to technology in Meta is promoting Threads posts on Facebook and there’s no way to opt out

Well… Of course they are.

TheHottub , to news in FCC moves forward with its plan to restore Obama-era net neutrality protections
@TheHottub@lemmy.world avatar

Why does the article have to say “Obama-era”? Net neutrality is just net neutral and we don’t need to add extra labels to create a headline. Annoying.

ImFresh3x ,

Because we had net neutrality under Obama. And there’s lots of people who don’t know that. I’ve seen numerous posts back on Reddit and recently on lemmy saying corporate dems will never enact NN. When they did, and they are again. I’m glad the article mentions it. Because those history revisionists “both sides” groups are loud and prominent.

TheHottub ,
@TheHottub@lemmy.world avatar

I remember it well. We just don’t need to add to the already polarized political atmosphere by making it Obama-era thing. I was then and still am a huge proponent of net neutrality.

ImFresh3x ,

We do need to add to the polarity. 100%. Dems are not like republicans. And republicans are not like dems. It needs to be pointed out and made clear.

It’s the moderates who said “polarity” was “tearing us apart” during the civil right movement.

MonsiuerPatEBrown , to news in FCC moves forward with its plan to restore Obama-era net neutrality protections

There is no fiber to the curb, and DSL rolled out in the US starting in the late 1990s.

Since then we have cable internet added to the mix.

US broadband speeds are like the US minimum wage.

FlyingSquid ,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

There is no fiber to the curb

Why would you want that now that there’s fiber to the home? That’s what we have.

US broadband speeds are like the US minimum wage.

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/9c78a47f-33a7-4f3d-a15a-5e8188c6b30f.png

And that’s because I’m paying for the lowest tier.

Happenchance ,

They are not implying all Americans have poor internet, they are implying that most Americans have bad internet and are forced to use it due to non-competition.

TheGalacticVoid ,

My options are Comcast or 100 megabit DSL. Neither are fiber.

SoleInvictus ,
@SoleInvictus@lemmy.world avatar

We have cable Internet up to 1Gbps or DSL at 1.5 Mbps. Such options!

TheGalacticVoid ,

I’d rather not deal with arbitrary data caps and random added fees. Screw Comcast.

Yewb , to news in FCC moves forward with its plan to restore Obama-era net neutrality protections

Ajit pai can go fuck himself

finkrat ,

Corporate traitor ass-clown, glad he’s out

mechoman444 ,

Twice.

In one day

notannpc ,

With a cactus.

BlackPenguins ,

And no lube.

totallynotarobot , to technology in British Museum is digitizing its entire collection in response to recent thefts | All of that scanning will cost over $12 million.

The thefts weren’t recent, they started stealing that collection decades ago.

sramder ,
@sramder@lemmy.world avatar

Higgs is suspected to have taken uncategorized items and selling them on the e-commerce website eBay. One item worth $64,000 was offered for online auction for as little as $51 and listings for artifacts from the museum’s collection appeared online as early as 2016, according to a report in the Telegraph.

totallynotarobot ,

The stealing I meant was the British Museum’s acquisition of the collection, but this too.

ilikekeyboards ,

With all my respects if you repatriate them here in Mexico they will end up in some gangsters villa. The ministry of culture is weaker than their coked up limp dicks.

totallynotarobot ,

Oh well that’s a drag :(

DeathWearsANecktie ,

Lol that was my first thought when I read this too. Nonetheless, there’s zero chance of any of the historical artifacts being repatriated to their countries of origin now. It’s a big loss.

masterspace , to technology in British Museum is digitizing its entire collection in response to recent thefts | All of that scanning will cost over $12 million.

Why the fuck is anyone writing an article about $12M dollars?

Do people not understand what rich people make from passive investments? Literally just repurpose a single rich person’s passive investment and you can pay to digitize a library’s worth of artifacts every year for eternity.

Society is absolutely fucked in the head if anyone is allowed to build a yacht without getting crowbarred in the back of the calf while we’re considering whether or not “we can afford to pay” to preserve priceless historical artifacts.

moipe , to technology in British Museum is digitizing its entire collection in response to recent thefts | All of that scanning will cost over $12 million.

A virtual version of the museum in 2029? What would be the point in going? I can look at a picture of a picture on the internet for free.

fakeman_pretendname ,

I get what you mean, like there’s definitely some stuff you can just look at a picture of it on the internet, but I guess for others it’s about the sense of space, connection, grouping, narrative, context etc that’s present with a well put together Museum or Gallery display.

Without all that, you’ve just got a car boot sale of random things - wheras the text, maps, illustrations, audio, video or 3d recreations etc that sits alongside - or simply the placement of things next to one another, or following through the room in a particular order is what really makes that stuff interesting.

Mandy , to technology in British Museum is digitizing its entire collection in response to recent thefts | All of that scanning will cost over $12 million.

So the museum famous for stealing its artifacts is complaining about said stuff being stolen from them?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines