Stuff shouldn’t include temporal or subjective aspects in their name like New Technology File System, Grand Unified Bootloader… that’s all I got but you get the idea.
I never bought CDs after about 1999, so this never affected me. However, if I’m remembering correctly, you could get past that nonsense by running a black sharpie marker along the outside of the CD, effectively making that portion unreadable. Unless I’m thinking of something else. Pls correct if this was about another nonsense DRM.
Maintaining standards is hard work. There isn’t a good reason to do it yourself, so pretty much every non-metric unit is now defined by its relationship to metric.
Write me a comment thread of two redditors arguing between the merits of using Celsius or Fahrenheit for their respective user
Response:
Redditor1: I can’t believe people still use Fahrenheit! Celsius is so much better and easier to understand. It’s based on the freezing and boiling points of water, which makes logical sense. Who needs Fahrenheit anyway?
Redditor2: Are you kidding me? Fahrenheit is way more practical! It provides a finer level of temperature precision and is better suited for everyday weather measurements. Celsius is just too limited with its smaller scale.
Redditor1: Precision? That’s just unnecessary! Celsius provides a clear understanding of temperature without the need for arbitrary reference points. The fact that water freezes at 0°C and boils at 100°C makes it intuitive and widely adopted worldwide. Plus, it’s used in scientific research and international standards.
Redditor2: Sure, Celsius might be more widely used internationally, but that doesn’t automatically make it superior. Fahrenheit has its advantages, especially when it comes to weather forecasting. The Fahrenheit scale allows for a more nuanced representation of temperature differences, which can be crucial when determining how hot or cold it actually feels.
Redditor1: But why complicate things with a scale that relies on arbitrary points like the freezing and boiling of brine solution and the human body temperature? Celsius is based on a fundamental and universal aspect of nature: water. It makes conversions between units easier and eliminates the need for mental calculations.
Redditor2: I understand your point about simplicity, but Fahrenheit offers a wider range of temperature values for everyday temperatures. It allows us to have more precise differentiations in weather forecasts, which is important for people who need accurate information for planning their day. Besides, those who grew up using Fahrenheit find it easier to relate to temperatures on that scale.
Redditor1: Well, I think the scientific community would disagree with you on that. Celsius is the standard in scientific research, and it’s taught in schools worldwide. It’s consistent, logical, and eliminates the need for multiple temperature scales. It’s time for Fahrenheit to step aside and let Celsius take over.
Redditor2: Scientific research is just one aspect of temperature measurement. Fahrenheit has its place in everyday life, especially in countries that have been using it for generations. It’s not about letting one scale take over the other; it’s about recognizing the benefits and practicality of both. People should have the freedom to choose what they’re most comfortable with, whether it’s Celsius or Fahrenheit.
Redditor1: Fair enough, personal preference does play a role, and people should have the freedom to choose. However, from a global perspective, Celsius provides a more standardized and universal approach to temperature measurement. It’s easier for international communication and understanding, which is increasingly important in our interconnected world.
Redditor2: I can respect your viewpoint on standardization, but let’s not forget that there are countries and regions where Fahrenheit is deeply ingrained in their culture and everyday life. It’s not just about personal preference; it’s about respecting diversity and different historical contexts. Both Celsius and Fahrenheit have their merits, and it’s up to individuals and communities to decide which one suits them best.
Scientists would end up causing a bigger genocide than a despotic politician could ever dream of. King, CEO, a farmer or a baker, whoever is put in charge should have to suffer the consequences of their failures too instead of being allowed to quietly shuffle off to cushy speaking gigs at the expense of wider society. Bring back decimations and obligatory seppuku for politicians, economists, central bankers and other policy makers I say. Even if it proves worse than the current regime in place, at least it will be an entertaining slide to hell.
en.wikipedia.org
Top