yogthos

yogthos OP , 1 month ago to technology in Pioneering ‘shark skin’ tech could propel China ahead of US in jet engine race

It’s like you don’t understand that these bombers were mass produced before ICBMs were developed. It’s just an example of legacy tech that US overinvested in. You have absolutely no clue what you’re talking about, and it shows. 😂

yogthos OP , 1 month ago to technology in US Abrams tanks failing in Ukraine as Russia mocks them as ‘empty tin cans’

last I checked, Israel mostly uses f-22s cause f-35 keep falling out of the sky timesofisrael.com/israel-grounds-11-f-35-jets-aft…

yogthos OP , 1 month ago to technology in Pioneering ‘shark skin’ tech could propel China ahead of US in jet engine race

Nobody flies b2s anywhere. Hypersonics are often launched from jets. Amazing that you can’t put two and two together. These technologies aren’t mutually exclusive.

yogthos OP , 1 month ago to technology in US Abrams tanks failing in Ukraine as Russia mocks them as ‘empty tin cans’

How many times have F35s been used for anything other than crashing into the ocean?

yogthos OP , 1 month ago to technology in Pioneering ‘shark skin’ tech could propel China ahead of US in jet engine race

You know what else air defense can’t shoot down effectively? Stealth bombers. Also being hard to soot down doesn’t help if there’s already a better option.

Oh yeah, that must be the reason US and Israel never fly them anywhere close to S400 systems in Syria. 😂

Russia’s don’t cost much because they’re just old ballistic missiles strapped to a plane, nothing particularly hard to shoot down about those. China’s cost accounting is very opaque, so we can’t really get an idea of how much they cost. But anyway, what matters for whether they are useful to the US is the cost the US would pay, not China.

Whatever helps you cope little buddy.

Hypersonic missiles for hitting ground targets are an expensive stop gap for before you’ve developed stealth bombers.

[citations needed]

I love how you just make stuff up here when faced with obvious inferiority of western technology and industrial capacity. There’s going to be so much coping for you to do in the coming years. Hope you have a good copium dealer.

yogthos OP , 1 month ago to technology in US Abrams tanks failing in Ukraine as Russia mocks them as ‘empty tin cans’

Western media has been telling us that Ukrainians have been trained up to NATO standards. So, going by that we have to assume that that’s the quality of NATO training and weaponry on display.

yogthos OP , 1 month ago to technology in US Abrams tanks failing in Ukraine as Russia mocks them as ‘empty tin cans’

Given that Ukrainians have been trained up to NATO standards for the past eight years, you’re presumably admitting something about the quality of NATO training. Interesting…

yogthos OP , 1 month ago to technology in Pioneering ‘shark skin’ tech could propel China ahead of US in jet engine race

It’s pretty clear that hypersonic missiles are very effective because current air defence systems aren’t able to shoot them down. This allows for doing deep strikes behind the line of contact with impunity. It’s quite obvious why US would desire such weapons, and in fact has been trying to develop them for around a decade now without success.

These missiles also don’t cost a billion dollars for China or Russia to make because they’re produced by state industry that’s not run for profit resulting in costs being orders of magnitude cheaper than they are in the west.

The whole purpose of US war industry is to suck up as much tax money as possible and put it back in the hands of the oligarchs. It’s not meant to produce cheap and effective weapons because that’s not profitable.

Hope that helps clear things up for you.

yogthos OP , 1 month ago to technology in Pioneering ‘shark skin’ tech could propel China ahead of US in jet engine race

https://media.tenor.com/KqOLJYj0mmUAAAAd/copium-cat.gif

yogthos OP , 1 month ago to technology in US Abrams tanks failing in Ukraine as Russia mocks them as ‘empty tin cans’

Or you know a tank that will be used in actual battle conditions where you’re not going to have guaranteed support. The whole NATO strategy has been to invade small defenceless countries and brutalize people there. You don’t need to worry about stuff like logistics in these situations. A real war is a different animal.

yogthos OP , 1 month ago to technology in US Abrams tanks failing in Ukraine as Russia mocks them as ‘empty tin cans’

ah the copes 😂

yogthos OP , 1 month ago to technology in US Abrams tanks failing in Ukraine as Russia mocks them as ‘empty tin cans’

They’ve been “testing” it for more than a decade at this point and even if Russia is able to actually bring the T-14 into service, they won’t be able to produce any significant number of them for the same reason their tank corps isn’t using many T-90M right now.

Uh yeah, developing new weapons platforms takes a long time. Look at how long US has been fumbling trying to make F-35 work. Also, if you still think that Russia doesn’t have industrial capacity to mass produce these, then you might want to read what people with a clue have to say rusi.org/…/attritional-art-war-lessons-russian-wa…

Go look up Operation Desert Storm and rethink what you wrote there.

LMFAO yeah, Abrams is great at blowing up tanks from the 70s with barely trained crews. Not so good at modern warfare against a peer competitor.

If there’s anything here that’s garbage, it’s your notions about tank design.

Any tank where electronics start to break down when it rains is very obviously a giant piece of shit.

One, parked under a tree, was almost immobile during CNN’s visit, due to an engine problem, the crew say, despite the vehicle having just been shipped in from Poland. They also complain of how, in rain or fog, condensation can fry the electronics inside the vehicle.

www.cnn.com/2024/05/29/europe/…/index.html

yogthos OP , 1 month ago to technology in US Abrams tanks failing in Ukraine as Russia mocks them as ‘empty tin cans’

Evidently you’re having trouble with the concept of something being in development. Try applying the same logic to F-35, how long has that turd been in development now with only 30% of them being functional?

yogthos OP , 1 month ago to technology in Pioneering ‘shark skin’ tech could propel China ahead of US in jet engine race

Probably the same reason why US can’t figure out how to make hypersonic weapons.

yogthos OP , 1 month ago to worldnews in How America Inadvertently Created an ‘Axis of Evasion’ Led by China

The funniest part is that it’s all a direct consequence of US actions. I predict that the war with Russia will be taught in history books as the pivotal moment that broke the back of US global hegemony. Until the war started, it was basically accepted that US and NATO run the world. Now we’re seeing a whole new economy emerging around BRICS and it’s a beautiful thing to watch.