wholookshere

wholookshere , 2 days ago

Okay but like, you also realize gas fees for transactions can get stupid expensive right? Banks don’t have variable rates.

wholookshere , 2 days ago

That’s not how fractions and math work though.

wholookshere , 9 days ago

That’s what they said about bitcoin, and there’s still nothing useful at any kind of scale outside of scams.

wholookshere , 11 days ago

Mmmmmm don’t know about that.

The Planck length is the minimum resolvable accuracy of the universe. That doesn’t mean it’s a building block like the electron is.

wholookshere , 11 days ago

They don’t make “discrete jumps” as in teleportation. They exist stable in discrete energy levels, but that doesn’t imply things don’t move continuously.

wholookshere , 11 days ago

A real number is the set of both rational and irrational numbers. Nothing about continuous anything.

wholookshere , 11 days ago

That’s not what I said?

They’re “stable” energy states. That’s all.

wholookshere , 11 days ago

Being continuous is not actually a requirement of being real.

wholookshere , 11 days ago

If you want my credentials, the second book is deriving the hydrogen atom.

https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/pictrs/image/7fbba8e4-3036-4cd8-b392-b447ff2c18e5.jpeg

wholookshere , 9 days ago

That’s not what Planck length is. It’s the minimum resolvable accuracy not measurement. Meaning we can’t prove something was somewhere specific beyond the Planck length. Not that it’s the building size of the universe.

simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_length#:~:text….

it is a common misconception that it is the inherent “pixel size” or smallest possible length of the universe.[1] If a length smaller than this is used in any measurement, then it has a chance of being wrong due to quantum uncertainty