There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

@tetranomos@mas.to cover
@tetranomos@mas.to avatar

tetranomos

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

tetranomos , to random
@tetranomos@mas.to avatar

"Library science scholars know that bibliographic and naming controls are central to making knowledge discoverable." https://pxlmo.com/i/web/post/640254525024232155

tetranomos OP ,
@tetranomos@mas.to avatar
tetranomos OP ,
@tetranomos@mas.to avatar
analyticus , to philosophyofmind
@analyticus@mastodon.social avatar

More than argument, logic is the very structure of reality

The patterns of reality

Some have thought that logic will one day be completed and all its problems solved. Now we know it is an endless task

https://aeon.co/essays/more-than-argument-logic-is-the-very-structure-of-reality

@philosophy @philosophie @philosophyofmind

tetranomos ,
@tetranomos@mas.to avatar
koen_hufkens , (edited ) to academicchatter
@koen_hufkens@mastodon.social avatar

Some reflections on the externalization of our inner dialogues through and how it influences student problem solving skills.

@academicchatter

https://khufkens.com/posts/lost-inner-voices-llm-impact-problem-solving-chatgpt-ml-teaching/

tetranomos , (edited )
@tetranomos@mas.to avatar

@koen_hufkens @academicchatter one of my theories has been that autistics and schizophrenics have been quite aware that such tools do this: their emergence is a means to block out those who have weaponized religious, economic, and political voices co-opted by those outside their generational peer group. it's time to start thinking at the level of philosophical war. the artilect war went online more than a decade ago. wars happen.

cbontenbal , to philosophy Dutch
@cbontenbal@mastodon.social avatar

I find myself not understanding the concept of atheism. Who wants to explain it to me in a coherent way for a beginner? With a metaphysical substantiation please, if that is at all possible.

@philosophy

tetranomos ,
@tetranomos@mas.to avatar

@fomosapien @Drew @cbontenbal @philippsteinkrueger @philosophy "arbitrarily" is the least fitting description of how spinoza chose to engage the outside state of play

tetranomos , (edited )
@tetranomos@mas.to avatar

@cbontenbal @philosophy atheism can be looked at from various of analytical lenses. to the linguistic, it is a seven letter diachronic term composed of morphemes, to the theologian or philosopher it is a stance about some arguments idealized into propositional or modal logic, to the anthropologist, it is a designation by which the circumstances of non-practice or non-belief is evidenced in behavior that relates variegated customs toward totemic or spiritual mediations of value. beliefs happen.

tetranomos ,
@tetranomos@mas.to avatar

@pauld @davidesalerno68 @cbontenbal @economics @smithkm @philosophy it should be brought to the foreground what quality of economy has always accompanied the philosophy: natural slavery (the pedant and the philosophy go hand-in-hand unless explicitly abolished)

image/png
image/png

tetranomos ,
@tetranomos@mas.to avatar

@pauld @davidesalerno68 @cbontenbal @economics @smithkm @philosophy let's ask ourselves some question here-then: if it is true that the pedant and the philosopher go hand-in-hand; to what extent is steiner here-now abolishing aspects of the philosopher, what is explored in her Methodology? that is a point-ed question to raised for all intents and purposes. we might see other such similar developments in other authors, namely those wishing to disabuse us all of the structure that founds pedantry.

tetranomos ,
@tetranomos@mas.to avatar

@pauld @davidesalerno68 @cbontenbal @economics @smithkm @philosophy a most obvious dynamic out of such discoveries is the phenomenon of pedantry, then: what would seem to involve learning (by children or anyone) to the extent that one "passes" by those expectations of the pedant, who might themselves only achieve enough learning (miming the philosopher) to ensure "students" keep up their studies, etc. this should be plain to all, and why it motivates steiners effort to abolish the term.

tetranomos ,
@tetranomos@mas.to avatar

@pauld @davidesalerno68 @cbontenbal @economics @smithkm @philosophy elsewhere, like in dalal, it would explain why it is that a certain structuring of psychology, that of essentializing [child-ish] qualities to adults such that they are given to only those who achieve pedantry-class understanding for instruction, then limits the potential of what psychology is responsive to, as we have seen systematically throughout the misdiagnosis crisis plaguing the medical sciences today.

tetranomos , (edited )
@tetranomos@mas.to avatar

@SusanHR @lack @EdwardJCornwell @msteenhagen @Drew @philippsteinkrueger @spencer @cbontenbal @philosophy what basis of abstraction or infold of possibility or level of description does one "accept" such an expression? logically? epistemology? metaphysically? physically?

  1. logically speaking, i think therefore i am
  2. epistemologically speaking, i think therefore i am
  3. physically speaking, i think therefore i am

and so on? descartes then supposed it can be accepted "without vanity". and how?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines