There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Rustmilian , to lemmyshitpost in Honey what’s wrong, you barely touched your Philly Cheesesteak Cheesecake
@Rustmilian@lemmy.world avatar
Rustmilian , (edited ) to lemmyshitpost in What does your booger feel like rn?
@Rustmilian@lemmy.world avatar

Used tampon, because my nose bled from the dry hot air.

Rustmilian , to lemmyshitpost in This will be YouTube in 2025
@Rustmilian@lemmy.world avatar

People with ADHD will never make it through an ad.

Rustmilian , to lemmyshitpost in Well... you asked...
@Rustmilian@lemmy.world avatar

Don’t forget the Vine boom and obnoxious ass air horn sound effect.

Rustmilian , to lemmyshitpost in Well... you asked...
@Rustmilian@lemmy.world avatar

Really made me LOL out loud in IRL, really got me ROTF on the floor.

Rustmilian , to lemmyshitpost in Well... you asked...
@Rustmilian@lemmy.world avatar

I’m lil’ly dying rn fr fr, so furn’y!! #I’mSuckingTheCheesePuffsOffMyFingys #I’mQuirky

Rustmilian , to lemmyshitpost in Well... you asked...
@Rustmilian@lemmy.world avatar

Satirical?

Rustmilian OP , to linux_gaming in Bugfix time! Looking at the Steam game bugs...
@Rustmilian@lemmy.world avatar

Yes. They’re live, so feel free to ask them about it. They can explain it much better than I ever could.

Rustmilian , to lemmyshitpost in First time trying to post on Lemmy
@Rustmilian@lemmy.world avatar
Rustmilian OP , (edited ) to lemmyshitpost in Are You an NPC?
@Rustmilian@lemmy.world avatar

It’s the type of words, I wouldn’t have scribbled them out if it was just “fuck, shit, bitch, or even a slur(evident by my previous shitpost)”, it’s just that child … and grape animals is a combo of words that’s crossing a line into a vitriolic territory. Maybe if I could actually mark the comment itself as NSFW instead of relying on spoilers, but that’s not currently possible. I just don’t want to risk it.

Rustmilian , (edited ) to technology in Andrej Karpathy endorses Apple Intelligence
@Rustmilian@lemmy.world avatar

We’re discussing Apple’s implementation of an OS level AI, it’s entirely relevant.

GrapheneOS has technical merit and is completely open source, infact many of the security improvements to Android/AOSP are from GrapheneOS.

I love Olan’s.

Who?

Rustmilian OP , (edited ) to lemmyshitpost in Are You an NPC?
@Rustmilian@lemmy.world avatar
Rustmilian , (edited ) to technology in Andrej Karpathy endorses Apple Intelligence
@Rustmilian@lemmy.world avatar

Yeah and apple is completely untrustworthy like any other corporation, my point exactly. Idk about you, but I’ll stick to what I can verify the security & privacy of for myself, e.g. Ollama, GrapheneOS, Linux, Coreboot, Libreboot/Canoeboot, etc.

Rustmilian , (edited ) to technology in Andrej Karpathy endorses Apple Intelligence
@Rustmilian@lemmy.world avatar

However, to process more sophisticated requests, Apple Intelligence needs to be able to enlist help from larger, more complex models in the cloud. For these cloud requests to live up to the security and privacy guarantees that our users expect from our devices, the traditional cloud service security model isn’t a viable starting point. Instead, we need to bring our industry-leading device security model, for the first time ever, to the cloud.

As stated above, Private cloud compute has nothing to do with the OS level AI itself. ರ⁠_⁠ರ That’s in the cloud not on device.

While we’re publishing the binary images of every production PCC build, to further aid research we will periodically also publish a subset of the security-critical PCC source code.

As stated here, it still has the same issue of not being 100% verifiable, they only publish a few code snippets they deam “security-critical”, it doesn’t allow us to verify the handling of user data.

  • It’s difficult to provide runtime transparency for AI in the cloud.
    Cloud AI services are opaque: providers do not typically specify details of the software stack they are using to run their services, and those details are often considered proprietary. Even if a cloud AI service relied only on open source software, which is inspectable by security researchers, there is no widely deployed way for a user device (or browser) to confirm that the service it’s connecting to is running an unmodified version of the software that it purports to run, or to detect that the software running on the service has changed.

Adding to what it says here, if the on device AI is compromised in anyway, be it from an attacker or Apple themselves then PCC is rendered irrelevant regardless if PCC were open source or not.

Additionally, I’ll raise the issue that this entire blog is nothing but just that a blog, nothing stated here is legally binding, so any claims of how they handled user data is irrelevant and can easily be dismissed as marketing.

Rustmilian , to technology in Andrej Karpathy endorses Apple Intelligence
@Rustmilian@lemmy.world avatar

AI powered Rootkit.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • lifeLocal
  • random
  • goranko
  • All magazines