There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

downpunxx OP ,
@downpunxx@kbin.social avatar

lol, yeah, and sir kir holding the line vs the antisemitic leftist muslim terrorist supporting hoarde only makes labour more electable with the entire nation

he knows exactly what he's doing

beltsin ,

I can’t believe this is a real comment

cuibono ,

All his comments under his own posts in this sub seem to be heavily downvoted. It’s actually kind of funny once you recognize his username and see he has posted something again.

IchNichtenLichten ,
@IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world avatar

Come on mods, you need to take out the trash. It’s starting to stink in here.

autotldr Bot ,

This is the best summary I could come up with:

As it stands, the mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, as well as 16 Labour frontbenchers and a third of the parliamentary party, have either called for a ceasefire or shared others’ backing for one on social media.

Starmer has argued that a ceasefire in the current war would simply freeze the status quo and that Hamas’s murder of 1,400 people on 7 October, and the group’s stated intention to strike again and again, makes this untenable.

There is a suspicion in some parts of Labour, however, that Starmer has been led to this position by a desire to draw a line between him and his predecessor, Corbyn, who was recorded in 2009 describing Hamas and Hezbollah representatives as “friends”.

Corbyn has spoken of his regret at that “inclusive” but inappropriate language, but in doing so he has argued that the way to peace will inevitably require all the warring parties to be brought together, and that there is no military solution.

The problem for Labour is that the proponents of these two positions tend to see those of a dissenting view as failing to live up to the party’s purpose of promoting social justice.

He later clarified that this was not his position but it has made it all the harder for him to convince the totality of his party that his stance is truly that of a politician who believes in social justice – and that’s the crux of the problem.

The original article contains 837 words, the summary contains 242 words. Saved 71%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •