There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

mozz OP ,
@mozz@mbin.grits.dev avatar

I'm sure I have blind spots. I think what I said about their coverage speaks for itself. You can read it, agree with it, disagree with it, whatever you want to do.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-68859840

This one story about this one man in Qatari custody was not covered on Al Jazeera, no. I'm sure he's not the only gay man in prison in Qatar. Like I say, I'm sure they have blind spots. I am comparing their blind spots against other publications that have other blind spots, not against a theoretical outlet which simply has none.

https://www.cbc.ca/sports/soccer/us-soccer-journalist-grant-wahl-dies-covering-world-cup-1.6681457

This one is covered pretty much word for word identical (presumably from the same wire service), including the discussion of his rainbow shirt, here.

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2022/nov/27/qatar-deaths-how-many-migrant-workers-died-world-cup-number-toll

Covered here, same facts, albeit with a fairly explicit level of slant.

Can I do the same for the New York Times now? Or an outlet of your choice which you would say is exceeding Al Jazeera's standard?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •