Given the history of outside influences on Haiti, I’m not sure how much of this story I buy.
Could be “violent gangs” torching “civil society” for “their own benefit”.
Could be “revolutionaries” torching “an oppressive oligarchy” for “the benefit of working people”.
Both of them would be reported the same way in US, or European newspapers.
I’m just skeptical when I see “violent gangs” taking over public infrastructure and when one of the “first casualties” of a “bloody uprising” is the Prime Minister who is not in fact dead, just forced to resign and flee the country.