As UN targets cybercrime, privacy groups say human rights to be violated
Nearly 200 nations approved the United Nations Convention against Cybercrime on Thursday afternoon at a special committee meeting that capped months of complicated negotiations. The treaty expected to win General Assembly approval within months creates a framework for nations to cooperate against internet-related crimes including the illegal access and interception of computer information; electronic eavesdropping and online child sex abuse.
Many cited examples of probable downsides like the case against Rappler, an online Philippine news outlet that angered former President Rodrigo Duterte by reporting critically on his deadly crackdown on illegal drugs and alarming human rights record.
[…]
The deal allows two countries to cooperate on any serious crime with a tech link, said Nick Ashton-Hart, spokesman for the Cybersecurity Tech Accord, a group of 158 technology companies.
The United Nations label attached to the convention could provide cover for repressive countries that want to go after people who use the internet in ways they dislike, according to private companies, international civil rights groups and electronic freedom advocates.
I think it’s a blank check for abuse because it has a very broad scope for domestic and cross-border spying and surveillance and a lack of robust checks and balances, said Katitza Rodrguez, the policy director for global privacy at the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
[…]
The final result doesn’t create more online safety and will be used to justify repression, Ashton-Hart said.
It’s going to happen more now because now countries that want to do this can point to a UN treaty to justify cooperating on repression, he said.
