There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

Entangled Particles Enable Future Actions to Change the Past

cross-posted from: beehaw.org/post/9003278

cross-posted from: beehaw.org/post/9003221

Summary:

Experiments show quantum particles can remain entangled across vast distances and times, with measurements affecting linked particles instantly.

“Delayed choice” experiments prove the future can retroactively change the past on the quantum scale by manipulating entangled particles.

Recent simulations showed manipulating entangled particles allowed altering an experiment’s outcome 25% of the time, appearing to influence the past.

Challenges causality but aligns with ideas in philosophy/spirituality that transcending time enables interacting with past/future.

Low success rate and decoherence effects prevent paradoxes by probabilistically filtering timeline changes.

Suggests broader possibilities for quantum technologies if coherence and retrocausal control improve.

Profound implications for understanding reality and time; more research at the intersection of physics, philosophy and consciousness is needed.

Admetus ,

A cursory search shows that a closed loop can be made between two particles that are entangled but other than that, scientists are sceptical of the possibility of time travel or entanglement over time. Only over distances.

Agree with Pons_Aelius.

UBER_GheistXL OP ,

deleted_by_author

    •
    Pons_Aelius , (edited )

    You agree? How cute.

    Yes, now that is a sign of a mature attitude and someone open to discussion of actual experimental results and not someone that has decided something is right because they want it to be.

    As Admetus said the idea of quantum entanglement causing problems with causality is very, very controversial and far from proven by any papers I have read so far.

    Happy to be proven wrong but as Sagan said: Extraordinary claims require Extraordinary evidence.

    Pons_Aelius ,

    Who are you?

    I suspect a bot post.

    This is not science, this is pop culture speculation dressed up to look like science.

    GammaGames ,

    Less than a day old too

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • [email protected]
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •