This makes sense to a degree, tbh. You cannot guarantee full removal anyways, at least over here a filetted fish still says that there might be the odd leftover bone in there.
It’s like, “yeah it’s 99% and any reasonable person would not assume 100% anyways”.
But the guy has a point, the bone was large enough to hurt him. Its advertised as boneless, because (as the justices even agree) it shouldnt have bones
What if something said nut-free or allergy free but contained tree nuts? I would hope the company selling that product would be liable
I hope at least the company went as far to pay for his medical bills. I think that's warranted
Yeah, hence the ‘to a degree’. Although I should have expanded upon that to include that while you should always be careful (same with pitted cherries or so), a bone that big is weird to still be in there.