GreyEyedGhost , 10 months ago

See, you’re talking like 3000+ acres is a lot on the global scale, and it just isn’t. You could literally cover a few fields that grow better in indirect light, produce more from your crops, and supply the global requirements for electricity. Seriously, just 5 square miles is over 3000 acres.

The only good argument against solar or wind is matching load against production, and that one is becoming less relevant all the time.