There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

jjnjjlr ,

Definitely not the latest from Mediatek or Qualcomm.

Suoko OP ,
@Suoko@feddit.it avatar

And still, it looks like they’re as fast as M2.

jjnjjlr ,

I mean the mediatek is nearly 460k points off, nearly 35%. That’s a pretty big difference. Is it noticeable by the user in most applications probably not but they aren’t close. The actual newest chips are though nanoreview.net/en/soc-list/rating

Suoko OP ,
@Suoko@feddit.it avatar

s9 ultra appears to be slower than pad6 though. And I see no 9200 mtk around

jjnjjlr ,

In terms of tablet scores yes. And I never said better but I did say closer. Even at that using kimovil as the source the 8 gen 2 in the Tab s9 ultra is only 1 percent behind the M2 in the iPad pro 6th gen. Which could be the difference between testing environments, thermal management, and straight up just better/worse quality silicon from chip to chip.

As far as the Dimensity 9200, you said soc comparison not tablet.

Suoko OP ,
@Suoko@feddit.it avatar

Mmm, I was talking about SOCs. The s9 ultra has the same screen res of the xiaomi pad6pro, so gen1 SOC looks faster than gen2. Unless its a problem of bad samsung ROMs

jjnjjlr ,

You can’t compare results from different versions of the antutu benchmark.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines