There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

ourhumanfam , to blackmastodon
@ourhumanfam@mastodon.world avatar

💛 “Nice Democracy You Have There . . .”

💛 Editor’s Letter: White Supremacy Always Deals from the Bottom of the Deck
💛 SCOTUS Gone Amok
💛 Hope Amidst Hopelessness
💛 Patriots in Song and Heart
💛 What, to the Slave, Is the Fourth of July?
💛 and a quote by Justice Jackson

@BigAngBlack
@blackmastodon
@BlackMastodon

https://www.ohfweekly.org/vol-5-no-24/

erinnacland , to academicchatter
@erinnacland@fediscience.org avatar

Wanted: Scientific Errors.

Cash Reward.

"Scientific-misconduct accusations are leading to retractions [...] But there’s no telling how widespread errors are in research: As it is, they’re largely brought to light by unpaid volunteers.

A program launching this month is hoping to shake up that incentive structure [...It] will pay reviewers to root out mistakes in influential papers,"

@academicchatter

https://error.reviews/

via https://www.chronicle.com/article/wanted-scientific-errors-cash-reward

csaetre ,
@csaetre@techhub.social avatar

1st thought: Cool!

The of fact checking might be a nice check and balance.

Might even bring a renewed focus on a methodological rigor and basic research.

2nd thought:

‘Checks and balances’ aren’t really working out so well for democracy.

, , ,

@erinnacland @academicchatter

TheConversationUS , to histodons
@TheConversationUS@newsie.social avatar

Last year, rewrote constitutional law about .

Now, the same justices will hear a case defining the limits of their decision calling for judges to use history to decided what regulations are legal.

At issue: can gun be taken away from domestic abusers?

"Domestic violence" was not an issue in the 18th century, but there were laws against going about armed “to the fear and terror of any person."
https://theconversation.com/supreme-court-justices-consider-whether-to-uphold-law-that-keeps-guns-out-of-the-hands-of-domestic-abusers-217161
@histodons

petersuber , to academicchatter
@petersuber@fediscience.org avatar

More than two-thirds (68%) of US college and university presidents believe that was wrong to rule that race-conscious admission policies were unconstitutional. "But in something of a mixed message, an even larger share (86%) feels as though their own institution will maintain its current level of diversity under the decision."
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/diversity/socioeconomics/2023/10/17/survey-two-three-college-presidents-oppose-affirmative


@academicchatter

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines