There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

pivic , to bookstodon
@pivic@kolektiva.social avatar

‘God forbid that a dog should die’: when Goodreads reviews go bad https://www.theguardian.com/books/2024/feb/17/god-forbid-that-a-dog-should-die-when-goodreads-reviews-go-bad

Goodreads is horrible for readers and books. The technical platform is very badly maintained with bugs in the extreme. Amazon mine user data for nefarious purposes, for example, in building concentration camps (ICE).

I recommend anyone who's interested in keeping track of their books in a social way (if one wants; one can also use the platform so that nobody else can see your activity) to use Bookwyrm (https://bookwyrm.social), which is completely open-source and actively maintained by very kind people—you can host your own instance, which is BTW built on ActivePub—to whom I donate money to keep the site rolling; no ads, no tracking.

There's also The StoryGraph (https://www.thestorygraph.com) that was created by people who were fed up with Amazon and their . The system is closed-source and actively maintained.

@bookstodon

pivic , to bookstodon
@pivic@kolektiva.social avatar

‘It’s totally unhinged’: is the book world turning against Goodreads? https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/dec/18/goodreads-review-bombing

I hate Goodreads. The site is just a continuation of Amazon as a surveillance capitalist nightmare, one that's never updated. Bugs are rife.

I prefer Bookwyrm and The StoryGraph:

https://bookwyrm.social
https://thestorygraph.com

@bookstodon

boud , to academicchatter
@boud@framapiaf.org avatar

There is a proposal [0] to modify the 'Find general sources' template [1]. The template is used on nearly a million Wikipedia pages (esp. talk pages, not articles). Knowledge review circulates between search engines + meta-search engines, academic peer-reviewed papers, and Wikipedia - should retain its power here? This decision-making is and .

@academicchatter

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28proposals%29#Modify_Module:Find_sources/templates/Find_general_sources

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Module:Find_sources/templates/Find_general_sources

pivic , to bookstodon
@pivic@kolektiva.social avatar
doboprobodyne , to technology in How Google Alters Search Queries to Get at Your Wallet - WIRED

Nice to see hamstring themselves; they're seen as a engine benchmark, so this makes it easier for (which uses to provide it's search answers, if I understand correctly) to edge up on them in the rankings...

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines