Lol i’m pretty sure SFTP, SCP, and rsync are pretty much all the same when it comes to speed. I’ve used all three very frequently, and by both bitrate and total time, only rsync or scp very rarely edges out for single small files.
I don’t understand (in this day and age) how any of these protocols have comparable performance difference to need the “Fast”/“Slow” row. None of these protocols would be computationally intensive enough to make a difference in performance, and should be only limited by line speed, no?
While that is a very common use case (bootp), I’ve ran across a lot of hardware that use it for config upload and download:
To upload a config to an industrial grade Garettcom switch you need to use tftp. Same goes for firmware updates and config backups.
This Cisco phone I was battling with once tried to download a config vea TFTP feom its DHCP server, assuming its DHCP server was part of the SIP infrastructure. The above mechanism was also used successfully by some other proprietary hardware built inhouse for firmware updates.
lemmy.geekforbes.com
Hot