There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

en.huji.ac.il

appel , to science in Discovery in Nanomachines within Living Organisms: Cytochromes P450 (CYP450s) Unleashed as Living Soft Robots

Couldn’t access this link so used another one I looked up, but I’m not really sure what the point of this was, what they state are common features of enzymes. I suppose they are referring to how the same principles could be used to create soft robots?

shreddy_scientist OP , (edited )
@shreddy_scientist@lemmy.ml avatar

Cytochrome p450 is one of the primary enzymes for detoxification in the liver. This study determined how it alters reaction mechanisms based only on an initial stimulus. So like a robot, it can provide a variety of functions based on its environment. One of the lead scientists in the study stated, “we have discovered that CYP450s act as soft-robot machines in ‘living matters,’ displaying a remarkable sensing and response-action capability. This is an exciting revelation, and we believe that similar mechano-transduction mechanisms of soft-impact cues might be at work in other soft-robot machines in nature.” I hope this helps make more sense of the research.

appel ,

But the initial stimulus is binding to the substrate, which then catalyses the reaction, which afaik, is how all enzymes work. I’m just wondering what is special about CYP450s in this case. Also, what are the multiple functions? Surely the entire organism itself is a better example of a soft robot

shreddy_scientist OP ,
@shreddy_scientist@lemmy.ml avatar

It has to to with the LDF repulsion and attraction. The study stated it was a 4D aspect of the CYP450s. It alters the active site to bind to different substrates depending on the toxins found in the liver.

appel ,

Thanks for the explanation, but I still don’t quite see how this is special, afaik LDF is analogous to van der Waals force? Is this basically the same as a “loose” active site? (Ie. Can bind a range of similar substrates) Is it because the LDF force acts on an allosteric site of the enzyme and thus changes the active site? I also don’t understand their use of the term “4D”. (Sorry for being difficult, just trying to understand the significance of the paper)

shreddy_scientist OP , (edited )
@shreddy_scientist@lemmy.ml avatar

Van der Waals is the attraction aspect of LDF, while steric repulsion is the flipside and still a part of LDF interactions. But based on the possible substrates LDF interaction with CYP450, the active site + mechanism of action will adjust to work with what’s around. Not just an allosteric aspect where a select few molecules can fit in the active site. Or at least that’s my understanding of the study’s findings.

Edit: The 4D aspect is referencing the LDF impact on the enzymes shape and function. LDF impacts all biochem reactions, dipole and hydrophobic forces are a bigger aspect to substrate binding though. But this breaks the mold of what we thought we knew about enzymes and opens the door for a more indepth understanding of biochemical reactions.

appel ,

I see, thanks for the explanations :)

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines