There have been multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of posting advertisement posts or replies containing unsolicited advertising.

Accounts which solely post advertisements, or persistently post them may be terminated.

@klerh@mastodon.zaclys.com cover
@klerh@mastodon.zaclys.com avatar

klerh

@[email protected]

parle de bibliothèques patrimoniales, de vie quotidienne, d'enfants et de lecture

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

dohanian , to bookhistodons
@dohanian@mastodon.social avatar

@bookhistodons @histodons A few questions for bibliographers, librarians, and book historians. The following have come up for me within the context of book history during the 16th, 17th, and 18th centuries. 1/3

klerh ,
@klerh@mastodon.zaclys.com avatar

@dohanian @bookhistodons @histodons everything is right : 1700-1701 ; Amsterdam [i.e. Paris] ; 1734 [i.e. 1738].

I don't know if there is a recommendation regarding Armenian printings.
Cataloguing practises I use would say that the date on the title page has to come first. If the year is different on the colophon, you should use the square brackets as if it was an incorrect one. 1/2

klerh ,
@klerh@mastodon.zaclys.com avatar

@dohanian @bookhistodons @histodons

If you are writing a bibliography for academic purposes, you could use the colophon year instead and explain your choice somewhere in intro or your text.

2/2

klerh ,
@klerh@mastodon.zaclys.com avatar

@dohanian @bookhistodons @histodons

Coda : most important part : Please explain to your readers what you chose and be consistent with it !
3/3

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • lifeLocal
  • goranko
  • All magazines
    •