I think in this case everyone should pay closer attention to this fact: the Arlington official declined to press charges for assault and the Army declined to press charges for the violation of federal law. And, at least in the case of the official, they did so because they fear violent retribution.
Violent retribution for doing their job respecting the sanctity of a cemetery for veterans.
Let me generalize and repeat: THE MILITARY IS AFRAID TO ENFORCE THE LAW AGAINST REPUBLICANS BECAUSE THEY’RE SCARED RIGHT-WING EXTREMISTS WILL KILL PEOPLE IF THEY DO.
Hello? Is this thing on?
You know that line before fascism people fear the United States might step over? LOOK BEHIND YOU.
Unironically, there’s a technique to it. I forgot how after I got older, and was genuinely frustrated trying to drink from one until I remembered how to do it.
They have these revolutionary containers made from paper that is layered in order to make it hard and card like. Almost stiff as a board. And is capable of holding liquids and also breaks down very easily. 😒
Like will it be a court order to ISPs to block X at a DNS level?
Yes, I believe the next step is for the Telecomm Agency to issue an ordinance. Google and Apple now have to remove the app from the store. Apparently VPNs are also not allowed to access it but I dunno how that would even work.
Apparently VPNs are also not allowed to access it but I dunno how that would even work
That’s the point: they can’t. However, based by the judge’s inquiry, the VPN apps are to be removed from app marketplaces, every single one of them. He asked Google and Apple to remove VPN apps altogether. This extrapolates the boundary of “blocking X”, because VPNs aren’t solely used for “bypassing ISP blocking”, VPNs are also used to link two or more devices into the same LAN over ther Internet, but this will be affected as soon as these apps vanish from Brazilian marketplaces.
Like will it be a court order to ISPs to block X at a DNS level?
I think that’s exactly it and how I understand this sentence:
Given that operators are aware of the widely publicized standoff and their obligation to comply with an order from de Moraes, plus the fact doing so isn’t complicated, X could be offline as early as 12 hours after receiving their instructions, said Luca Belli, coordinator of the Technology and Society Center at the Getulio Vargas Foundation, a university in Rio de Janeiro.
So glad we have a private company that we have no affiliation with tracking practically every phone on the planet. Feels like this “feature” is illegal by way of wiretapping and stalking laws.
Well the US has a pretty strong affiliation with SpaceX, given that they permit all their launches. Also, I can’t imagine the US would get away with launching similar technology themselves as exclusively military satellites - other nations would object.
This was a motion to dismiss a fairly standard thing for a judge to rule on before a trial. The only effect of this ruling is that the case wasn’t dismissed. And if it was dismissed at this stage it likely would have been done without prejudice. Meaning that they could just refile elsewhere.
Jfc, someone plz just staple that gaping hole he calls a mouth shut already. I cringe everything I hear him speak "were leading her in in the internet " my good bitch that’s cause your videos are being passed around so we can make fun of you. Everything he says hes beating her in the polls etc, I immediately check. Not once have I found it to be true
news
Oldest
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.